All news
Enforcement July 23, 2026 4 min

Spain: EUR 18 million to Amadeus for reusing booking data for product development

The AEPD sanctions the travel tech giant: years-old data aggregated into profiles, without a specific notice and without a valid legal basis

TL;DR for the DPO

The point is not the travel sector: it is REUSE. Data collected to deliver a service, reused years later to build profiles and develop products. The charges are Art. 14 (notice when data does not come from the data subject) and Art. 6 (no valid basis: legitimate interest was invoked but never balanced).

The three points that matter

  • 'Reasonable expectation' is the real test: someone booking a flight expects their data to serve the flight, not to feed a technology provider's product development years later. Once reuse leaves that expectation, legitimate interest does not hold.
  • Article 14 is the forgotten one: when data arrives from another party in the chain rather than from the data subject, the notice is still due - and that is where almost everyone stops.
  • The legitimate interest balancing must be DOCUMENTED beforehand, not reconstructed in defence. A written, dated and filed LIA is what separates a defensible position from an assertion.

What to do now, in practice

1) In the Art. 30 register, for each activity ask: is the data used ONLY for the stated purpose? Look especially at internal analytics, model training, product development and 'improvement' statistics; 2) where data comes from third parties, check the Art. 14 notice exists and was actually provided; 3) for every legitimate interest invoked, require a written LIA: purpose, necessity, balancing, mitigation; 4) beware historical data: an archive collected years ago does not become freely reusable with the passing of time.

Why it matters for your clients

Reuse for 'product improvement' is today the most frequent request reaching the DPO from marketing and development teams, often with the line 'it's data we already have'. Eighteen million is a clear answer: having it does not mean being able to use it for anything. And with the AI Act arriving, the same question will return as 'can we train a model on it?'.

Official source:Spanish Data Protection Agency - sanction against Amadeus IT Group S.A., published 26 May 2026

Looking for a workspace for your DPO work?

DPO Workspace is built by a certified DPO. 30-day free trial.

Start free

Related articles

Enforcement
€8,6Mfor sexual-orientation data in ad auctions

Norway fines Xandr (Microsoft) €8.6 million: Grindr's consent did not cover the ad auctions

Simply using Grindr reveals a person's sexual orientation. Xandr received that information, with the advertising ID and IP address, during ad auctions and relied on the consent collected by the app, which was invalid. For the Norwegian authority, accountability cannot be delegated: every joint controller must check the consent it relies on.

Oct 16, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
€16,7Mfor telemarketing and contracts activated without consent

Italian DPA fines Wind Tre €16.7 million: telemarketing despite objections and contracts activated without customers' knowledge

People who had objected kept receiving calls, and some contracts were activated without the person knowing. The Garante fines Wind Tre €16.7 million and restates a principle for every company with an agency network: responsibility is not outsourced along with sales.

Oct 12, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
€350kto controller and processor over outdated systems

Greece: €350,000 for a data breach — both the Ministry and the processor running outdated systems fined, and there was no Article 28 contract

An attack on the systems of the agency running a Ministry's programmes exposed identification, financial and health data of a very large number of people. The Hellenic DPA fines the controller €200,000 and the processor €150,000: notifying well is not enough if the supplier works on outdated systems and the relationship is not governed by a contract.

Oct 08, 2026New 5 min