All news
Enforcement July 6, 2026 5 min

France: 23 fines in six months under the simplified procedure. Small amounts, new target

EUR 133,750 in total, under 6,000 each. The point is not the figure: it is that they hit shops, practices and SMEs, and they land fast

TL;DR for the DPO

The French simplified procedure is designed for straightforward cases: fast investigation, modest amount, and in most cases no naming. The message for anyone advising SMEs is that the authorities' attention threshold has dropped: you no longer need to be large to end up in a decision.

The three infringements that keep coming back

  • Excessive video surveillance: cameras filming workstations continuously, break areas, or the public pavement. It is the most frequent infringement in small businesses, and it almost always starts with an installer pointing the lens where it is convenient rather than where it is lawful.
  • Non-compliant cookie banners: refusing is not as easy as accepting, trackers fire before any choice, withdrawal is missing. The CNIL has been consistent on this for years and other authorities have followed.
  • Failure to respond to access and erasure requests: the most mundane and the most avoidable. Ignoring a data subject produces a complaint, and the complaint opens an investigation into everything else.
5,815EUR
average amount per fine

Why it matters more than the figure

A controller reading EUR 133,750 spread across twenty-three decisions may conclude the financial risk is negligible. That reading is short-sighted for two reasons. First: the simplified procedure is fast, so the number of decisions per year rises while the authority's effort per case falls. Second: an investigation does not stop at what triggered it. A complaint about an ignored erasure request leads the authority to look at the records, the notices and the cookies, and the final penalty adds up things the controller did not know it had to defend.

What to do now, with small clients

1) Video surveillance: ask for photographs of what each camera actually frames, not the installation diagram. The gap between those two documents is where the fines live. 2) Cookies: open the client's site in a private window and count the clicks needed to refuse. If it is more than to accept, that alone is a non-compliance. 3) Data subject requests: check there is an address someone actually reads, and a request log with dates. 4) Remind the client that the cost of a decision is not the fine: it is the weeks of investigation and the documents you discover are missing while you face it.

Official source:CNIL - Fines adopted under the simplified procedure, review of 6 July 2026

Looking for a workspace for your DPO work?

DPO Workspace is built by a certified DPO. 30-day free trial.

Start free

Related articles

Enforcement
26complaints, and no fine

You declare contract, then you reject the objections: Norway shows how the two mistakes travel together

SATS asked members for a photo kept in the membership system and used at the desk to check the identity of people coming in. Datatilsynet found the notice stated the wrong legal basis, failed to explain the right to object, and that objections were rejected without demonstrating compelling legitimate grounds. The deadline to fix it is 11 September 2026.

Aug 26, 2026New 6 min
Enforcement
825 mln €the second-largest fine ever

Eight hundred and twenty-five million for an algorithm that deactivated accounts with nobody looking

It is the second-largest fine ever imposed under the GDPR, behind only Meta's 1.2 billion. It is not about a data transfer or a security breach: it is about Article 22, the rule on automated decisions that almost nobody documents because it looks like a big-platform problem. It is in fact about anyone who lets software decide something that weighs on a person's life.

Aug 24, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
64 mln złagainst 14 the year before

Poland quadrupled its fines in a year, and the three highest ever all date from 2025

For years Poland was treated as a low-enforcement market. That assumption no longer holds: in twelve months the total went from fourteen to over sixty-four million zloty, and the three largest fines in the country's history all carry the same year. If you look after a client with a branch, a supplier or a service centre in Poland, the risk calculation has changed.

Aug 24, 2026New 4 min