All news
Enforcement July 21, 2026 4 min

Credit scoring in utilities: the Italian DPA hits the whole chain with three decisions in one day

Experian, Hera Comm and Cerved sanctioned on 3 July 2026. The message: whoever assesses a customer's creditworthiness must say so, explain how, and answer their requests

TL;DR for the DPO

Three decisions of 3/7/2026 on the same chain: those providing the score (Experian, Cerved) and those using it to decide whether to activate a supply contract (Hera Comm). Recurring breaches: Arts. 5, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 28 GDPR, plus privacy by design and by default. For Experian the aggravating factors are gravity (transparency, rights, minimisation), repeated conduct and duration: about two and a half years.

The three points that matter

  • Responsibility cannot be delegated to the score provider: the company using the credit check to decide on a contract is the controller of that processing. It must inform the individual, state the logic of the assessment and honour the right of access, even when data comes from an external provider.
  • Article 28 is the weak link: relationships between controller and scoring provider must be governed by contracts that actually describe the processing, not by generic clauses. In the Hera Comm case the Art. 28 breach is charged alongside the principle-based ones.
  • Privacy by design and by default (Art. 25) becomes a standalone charge: fixing it afterwards is not enough, the system had to be built with protective settings. The same line seen in the AgID and Character.AI decisions.

What to do now, in practice

For clients assessing their own customers (utilities, telcos, rental, leasing, e-commerce with deferred payment): 1) check the notice clearly states that an assessment is carried out and on what data; 2) map the flow to the scoring provider in the Art. 30 register and review the Art. 28 agreement; 3) prepare a response procedure for access requests covering the score and its logic; 4) document privacy-by-design choices, including default settings.

Why it matters for your clients

Credit checking is one of those activities almost nobody records in the register, because it feels like 'a commercial verification'. Three decisions in one day say otherwise: it is processing in its own right, with information duties and rights to guarantee. For a DPO it is a concrete audit opportunity on a process clients often do not realise they run.

Official source:Italian Data Protection Authority - decisions of 3 July 2026, doc. nos. 10273659 (Experian Italia), 10273926 (Hera Comm), 10273976 (Cerved)

Looking for a workspace for your DPO work?

DPO Workspace is built by a certified DPO. 30-day free trial.

Start free

Related articles

Enforcement
€8,6Mfor sexual-orientation data in ad auctions

Norway fines Xandr (Microsoft) €8.6 million: Grindr's consent did not cover the ad auctions

Simply using Grindr reveals a person's sexual orientation. Xandr received that information, with the advertising ID and IP address, during ad auctions and relied on the consent collected by the app, which was invalid. For the Norwegian authority, accountability cannot be delegated: every joint controller must check the consent it relies on.

Oct 16, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
€16,7Mfor telemarketing and contracts activated without consent

Italian DPA fines Wind Tre €16.7 million: telemarketing despite objections and contracts activated without customers' knowledge

People who had objected kept receiving calls, and some contracts were activated without the person knowing. The Garante fines Wind Tre €16.7 million and restates a principle for every company with an agency network: responsibility is not outsourced along with sales.

Oct 12, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
€350kto controller and processor over outdated systems

Greece: €350,000 for a data breach — both the Ministry and the processor running outdated systems fined, and there was no Article 28 contract

An attack on the systems of the agency running a Ministry's programmes exposed identification, financial and health data of a very large number of people. The Hellenic DPA fines the controller €200,000 and the processor €150,000: notifying well is not enough if the supplier works on outdated systems and the relationship is not governed by a contract.

Oct 08, 2026New 5 min