Your cookie preferences

EDPB guidance · Art. 7 GDPR

We use technical cookies essential for the platform to work (login, security, sessions). We would also like to use analytics cookies to understand how to improve it.

You can accept all, reject all, or choose which categories to switch on.Your consent is valid for 6 months and you can withdraw it at any time from the footer.

You will find everything in our privacy notice.

All news
Enforcement July 9, 2026 4 min

Enel Energia fined EUR 563,052: the 'administrative' call that turns into a sales pitch

Decision 170/2026: the legal basis of a service call does not cover commercial offers. The 90-second SMS opt-out and weak partner controls also rejected

TL;DR for the DPO

Decision no. 170/2026: EUR 563,052 to Enel Energia. Breaches of Arts. 5, 6, 7, 24 and 28 GDPR and Art. 130 of the Italian Privacy Code: (1) a service call used to sell = change of purpose without a legal basis; (2) an SMS opt-out with 90 seconds to refuse is not consent; (3) partner controls activated only after the proceeding started, and an agency already sanctioned for marketing re-contracted two months later. Beyond the fine, an order to fix the entire chain.

The three points that matter

  • Purpose does not stretch by itself: if you call to complete paperwork (contract performance), that legal basis does NOT cover a commercial offer in the same call. Marketing needs its own, verifiable, prior consent.
  • Opt-out is not consent: an SMS with a link to click within 90 seconds NOT to be re-contacted reverses the GDPR logic. The DPA points the other way: double opt-in, with a positive action by the person.
  • The chain is the controller's responsibility (Arts. 24 and 28): contractual penalties on paper are worthless if controls start only when the authority knocks. Contracting a partner just sanctioned for marketing is an own goal in an investigation.

What to do now, in practice

For every client making phone contacts: 1) separate service calls from commercial ones with scripts and training - operators must not 'seize the opportunity'; 2) check how marketing consent is collected: if the mechanism is an opt-out, rebuild it; 3) audit partners/call centres: upstream consents, opt-out register checks, and DOCUMENTED controls (not just clauses). The Art. 30 record must distinguish the two purposes with their legal bases.

Why it matters for your clients

You do not need to be Enel: any SME whose customer desk 'while we are at it' pitches an offer is doing exactly the same thing. This decision is the concrete example to bring to front-office training: the difference between a lawful call and a breach is one sentence spoken on the phone.

Official source:Italian Data Protection Authority - decision no. 170 of 12 March 2026 (Enel Energia S.p.A.)

Looking for a workspace for your DPO work?

DPO Workspace is built by a certified DPO. 30-day free trial.

Start free

Related articles

Enforcement
€16,7Mfor telemarketing and contracts activated without consent

Italian DPA fines Wind Tre €16.7 million: telemarketing despite objections and contracts activated without customers' knowledge

People who had objected kept receiving calls, and some contracts were activated without the person knowing. The Garante fines Wind Tre €16.7 million and restates a principle for every company with an agency network: responsibility is not outsourced along with sales.

Oct 12, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
€350kto controller and processor over outdated systems

Greece: €350,000 for a data breach — both the Ministry and the processor running outdated systems fined, and there was no Article 28 contract

An attack on the systems of the agency running a Ministry's programmes exposed identification, financial and health data of a very large number of people. The Hellenic DPA fines the controller €200,000 and the processor €150,000: notifying well is not enough if the supplier works on outdated systems and the relationship is not governed by a contract.

Oct 08, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
€4kfor a camera pointed at a home

Italian DPA fines the municipality of Arvier €4,000: a camera filmed a resident's windows and balconies, and the masking came too late

A small municipality in the Aosta Valley uses cameras for traffic, parking, number plates, the environment and civil protection. A resident finds that one covers her home. The Garante imposes a fine and makes a point that applies to every system: masking private areas is designed before the camera is switched on, not after the complaint.

Oct 08, 2026New 5 min