All news
Enforcement July 6, 2026 4 min

Italy's DPA halts stress and emotion monitoring at work: not even in aggregate form

With decision no. 342/2026 the authority blocks systems that track employees' emotional state. And the AI Act adds an explicit ban on emotion recognition in the workplace

TL;DR for the DPO

The Italian DPA (decision no. 342/2026) blocked stress and emotion monitoring in the workplace: data on staff health or psychological path cannot be accessible to the employer, NOT EVEN in aggregate form, because in small contexts aggregation does not prevent re-identification and the surveillance effect remains. In parallel, the AI Act prohibits AI systems inferring emotions at work (Art. 5, a prohibited practice since 2 February 2025).

The three points that matter

  • 'Aggregated' does not mean 'safe': in a 10-person office, the department's average stress score identifies people just fine. The DPA is clear: staff psycho-emotional data must not reach the employer in any form.
  • Organisational wellbeing has lawful paths: anonymous surveys run by independent third parties, listening desks, the occupational physician. What is not lawful is a continuous flow of emotional data to whoever manages careers and contracts.
  • AI Act Art. 5: AI systems inferring emotions in the workplace are a PROHIBITED practice (save for medical or safety reasons). Anyone proposing wearables, tone-analysis software or 'emotion' cameras for employees is proposing something unlawful.

What to do now, in practice

Check with clients: 1) wellbeing platforms and climate surveys - who sees the data and at what granularity? 2) HR tools with individual 'sentiment analysis' or engagement scores - review immediately; 3) any AI project touching workers' emotional state must be classified: it is almost always an Art. 5 prohibited practice, not merely 'high-risk'. The risk-classification template in the generator includes exactly this check.

Why it matters for your clients

The market pushes ever more invasive 'people analytics', often sold as welfare. This decision gives the DPO a clear-cut argument: the line is not 'let's anonymise a bit' - certain data simply must not reach the employer. And with the AI Act the perimeter is even stricter: for emotion recognition at work there is no legal basis to look for, there is a ban.

Official source:Italian Data Protection Authority - decision no. 342/2026

Looking for a workspace for your DPO work?

DPO Workspace is built by a certified DPO. 30-day free trial.

Start free

Related articles

Enforcement
26complaints, and no fine

You declare contract, then you reject the objections: Norway shows how the two mistakes travel together

SATS asked members for a photo kept in the membership system and used at the desk to check the identity of people coming in. Datatilsynet found the notice stated the wrong legal basis, failed to explain the right to object, and that objections were rejected without demonstrating compelling legitimate grounds. The deadline to fix it is 11 September 2026.

Aug 26, 2026New 6 min
Enforcement
825 mln €the second-largest fine ever

Eight hundred and twenty-five million for an algorithm that deactivated accounts with nobody looking

It is the second-largest fine ever imposed under the GDPR, behind only Meta's 1.2 billion. It is not about a data transfer or a security breach: it is about Article 22, the rule on automated decisions that almost nobody documents because it looks like a big-platform problem. It is in fact about anyone who lets software decide something that weighs on a person's life.

Aug 24, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
64 mln złagainst 14 the year before

Poland quadrupled its fines in a year, and the three highest ever all date from 2025

For years Poland was treated as a low-enforcement market. That assumption no longer holds: in twelve months the total went from fourteen to over sixty-four million zloty, and the three largest fines in the country's history all carry the same year. If you look after a client with a branch, a supplier or a service centre in Poland, the risk calculation has changed.

Aug 24, 2026New 4 min