Your cookie preferences

EDPB guidance · Art. 7 GDPR

We use technical cookies essential for the platform to work (login, security, sessions). We would also like to use analytics cookies to understand how to improve it.

You can accept all, reject all, or choose which categories to switch on.Your consent is valid for 6 months and you can withdraw it at any time from the footer.

You will find everything in our privacy notice.

All news
Enforcement July 6, 2026 4 min

Italy's DPA halts stress and emotion monitoring at work: not even in aggregate form

With decision no. 342/2026 the authority blocks systems that track employees' emotional state. And the AI Act adds an explicit ban on emotion recognition in the workplace

TL;DR for the DPO

The Italian DPA (decision no. 342/2026) blocked stress and emotion monitoring in the workplace: data on staff health or psychological path cannot be accessible to the employer, NOT EVEN in aggregate form, because in small contexts aggregation does not prevent re-identification and the surveillance effect remains. In parallel, the AI Act prohibits AI systems inferring emotions at work (Art. 5, a prohibited practice since 2 February 2025).

The three points that matter

  • 'Aggregated' does not mean 'safe': in a 10-person office, the department's average stress score identifies people just fine. The DPA is clear: staff psycho-emotional data must not reach the employer in any form.
  • Organisational wellbeing has lawful paths: anonymous surveys run by independent third parties, listening desks, the occupational physician. What is not lawful is a continuous flow of emotional data to whoever manages careers and contracts.
  • AI Act Art. 5: AI systems inferring emotions in the workplace are a PROHIBITED practice (save for medical or safety reasons). Anyone proposing wearables, tone-analysis software or 'emotion' cameras for employees is proposing something unlawful.

What to do now, in practice

Check with clients: 1) wellbeing platforms and climate surveys - who sees the data and at what granularity? 2) HR tools with individual 'sentiment analysis' or engagement scores - review immediately; 3) any AI project touching workers' emotional state must be classified: it is almost always an Art. 5 prohibited practice, not merely 'high-risk'. The risk-classification template in the generator includes exactly this check.

Why it matters for your clients

The market pushes ever more invasive 'people analytics', often sold as welfare. This decision gives the DPO a clear-cut argument: the line is not 'let's anonymise a bit' - certain data simply must not reach the employer. And with the AI Act the perimeter is even stricter: for emotion recognition at work there is no legal basis to look for, there is a ban.

Official source:Italian Data Protection Authority - decision no. 342/2026

Looking for a workspace for your DPO work?

DPO Workspace is built by a certified DPO. 30-day free trial.

Start free

Related articles

Enforcement
€16,7Mfor telemarketing and contracts activated without consent

Italian DPA fines Wind Tre €16.7 million: telemarketing despite objections and contracts activated without customers' knowledge

People who had objected kept receiving calls, and some contracts were activated without the person knowing. The Garante fines Wind Tre €16.7 million and restates a principle for every company with an agency network: responsibility is not outsourced along with sales.

Oct 12, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
€350kto controller and processor over outdated systems

Greece: €350,000 for a data breach — both the Ministry and the processor running outdated systems fined, and there was no Article 28 contract

An attack on the systems of the agency running a Ministry's programmes exposed identification, financial and health data of a very large number of people. The Hellenic DPA fines the controller €200,000 and the processor €150,000: notifying well is not enough if the supplier works on outdated systems and the relationship is not governed by a contract.

Oct 08, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
€4kfor a camera pointed at a home

Italian DPA fines the municipality of Arvier €4,000: a camera filmed a resident's windows and balconies, and the masking came too late

A small municipality in the Aosta Valley uses cameras for traffic, parking, number plates, the environment and civil protection. A resident finds that one covers her home. The Garante imposes a fine and makes a point that applies to every system: masking private areas is designed before the camera is switched on, not after the complaint.

Oct 08, 2026New 5 min