Your cookie preferences

EDPB guidance · Art. 7 GDPR

We use technical cookies essential for the platform to work (login, security, sessions). We would also like to use analytics cookies to understand how to improve it.

You can accept all, reject all, or choose which categories to switch on.Your consent is valid for 6 months and you can withdraw it at any time from the footer.

You will find everything in our privacy notice.

All news
Regulation August 28, 2026 5 min

Seven sites switched off the UK rather than protect children

Ofcom, 28 August: seven high-risk services blocked UK access and two introduced age checks. Eighteen months into the Online Safety Act: over a hundred platforms examined and more than £6 million in fines

In short

On 28 August 2026 Ofcom, the UK online safety regulator, published an update on the work of the teams that engage with platforms before a formal investigation is needed. The result: seven sites posing a significant risk of harm to children blocked access from the UK, and two more introduced age assurance.

What happened

Ofcom runs a taskforce dedicated to "small but risky" services: modest sites whose main content is harmful material. Under that pressure, two sites dedicated to graphic violence and serious injury content deployed age assurance to keep UK children out. Seven others preferred to shut the door on the UK entirely: five hosted graphic violence, two hosted suicide content.

Blocking UK IP addresses — geoblocking — is a route Ofcom accepts: if the service is no longer reachable, the risk to UK users falls away. But it is also the cheapest route, and it changes nothing for users in every other country.

The first eighteen months in numbers

  • More than 100 platforms examined since the Act came into force
  • Over £6 million in fines against 10 providers
  • 9 services which, in this update alone, blocked the UK or introduced age checks
  • Earlier Ofcom research had already found children first encounter this content while still at primary school, and describe it as an inevitable part of being online

The open letter to platforms

On the same day Ofcom wrote to platforms to remind them of something some were evidently taking for granted: existing duties are not suspended by the UK Government's announced ban on social media for under-16s. The new measures are expected from spring 2027; until then, and after, Online Safety Act duties stand. In October the regulator will publish a rapid assessment of what "highly effective age assurance" means at the sixteen threshold.

Why this matters outside the UK too

The British model — safety duties for anyone reachable from the country, with geoblocking as the only alternative — is becoming a reference point. If a European company runs a user-generated content service reachable from the UK, the question is not whether the GDPR is enough: these are two different regimes, and the second applies by user territory, not by company seat.

Honestly: nine services are not a revolution, and the seven that left still exist for everyone else. But the interesting part of the update is not the count, it is the method. Ofcom argues that persuasion before formal investigation delivers results faster than proceedings that take years. That is a claim European data protection authorities, sitting on multi-year backlogs, would do well to read.

Official source:Ofcom - UK children protected from more high-risk sites as a result of Ofcom action (28 agosto 2026)Official source:Ofcom - Our approach to online safety supervision and compliance (28 agosto 2026)

Looking for a workspace for your DPO work?

DPO Workspace is built by a certified DPO. 30-day free trial.

Start free

Related articles

Regulation
nullathe decision on a worker taken by the algorithm alone, from 23 October

A dismissal decided by the algorithm is void: from 23 October in Italy

Published in Official Gazette no. 234 of 8 October 2026 and in force since 23 October, decree no. 179/2026 provides that final decisions on the employment relationship cannot be based solely on automated processing, that the worker may request an understandable explanation, and that decisions taken in breach are void. In parallel, AI systems affecting work organisation enter the risk assessment under Article 28 of decree 81/2008. For a DPO this is the rare case where the consequence is not economic but civil, and it changes how the check is framed.

Oct 08, 2026New 8 min
Regulation
3signals that make notification due

Poland's UODO: not every breach must be notified. Public-register data on one side, PESEL, health and financial data on the other

If an invoicing system leaks only a sole trader's name, business name, tax number and registered address, already public in the business register, risk is normally unlikely. If it also leaks the national ID number, purchase details revealing health, or financial data, notification is due. Either way, the decision goes into the internal register.

Oct 05, 2026New 5 min
Regulation
120days to charge you, not to fine you

The 120 days are not the deadline to fine you: they are the deadline to charge you

Anyone who built an appeal on the authority's delay should re-read the calendar. The Court clarifies three things: the complaint procedure and the sanctioning procedure are autonomous, so overrunning the nine-to-twelve months on the complaint does not extinguish the power to fine; the 120 days are for notifying the charge, not for imposing the fine; and they run from the «definitive finding», which is not the first notice but the moment the authority can assess every element — including the hearing of your side. After the charge, only the five-year limitation period remains.

Sep 20, 2026 7 min