Your cookie preferences

EDPB guidance · Art. 7 GDPR

We use technical cookies essential for the platform to work (login, security, sessions). We would also like to use analytics cookies to understand how to improve it.

You can accept all, reject all, or choose which categories to switch on.Your consent is valid for 6 months and you can withdraw it at any time from the footer.

You will find everything in our privacy notice.

All news
Enforcement August 24, 2026 4 min

Poland quadrupled its fines in a year, and the three highest ever all date from 2025

Sixteen decisions, eighteen addressees, over sixty-four million zloty — against fourteen the year before. The record involves the postal operator, a bank and a restaurant chain

TL;DR for the DPO

Three cases, three mistakes you find everywhere: using data collected for a public purpose for a different one, copying identity documents without showing it was actually necessary, and leaving your own staff's data exposed. None of the three requires sophisticated technology to commit.

The numbers

In 2025 the President of the Personal Data Protection Office adopted sixteen fining decisions against eighteen entities, totalling more than sixty-four million zloty. The previous year the total was close to fourteen million. This is not a gradual rise: it is a change of scale, and the three largest fines ever imposed in Poland fall within those twelve months.

Postal operator: twenty-seven million for data used for another purpose

The largest fine concerns the national postal operator and the data of some thirty million citizens taken from the PESEL population register ahead of the 2020 postal elections, processed without an adequate basis. It is the textbook purpose-limitation case: data lawfully sitting in a public register does not thereby become usable for a different aim, not even when that aim is itself public.

Bank: eighteen point four million for copies of identity documents

A credit institution was fined for copying and scanning customers' identity documents without demonstrating that doing so was necessary to meet anti-money-laundering obligations. This is the point that touches the largest number of businesses: AML rules require identification, they do not automatically require photocopying. The necessity of that copy must be proven, not assumed, and almost nobody keeps the assessment that justifies it.

Restaurants: sixteen point nine million for the company's own staff data

The third decision hit a restaurant chain after an incident in which employee information became publicly accessible. It is worth noting whose data it was: not customers', but the workforce's — the category that risk analyses systematically treat as less exposed and that in fact produces the highest fines, because an employment relationship leaves the individual no alternative.

What to do now, if you have clients with a presence in Poland

1) Check whether anyone copies identity documents, and ask where it is written down why that is necessary; 2) make sure data received from public registers or bodies is not reused for purposes other than collection; 3) treat the HR archive with the same care as the customer one, because the authority does.

Official source:Urząd Ochrony Danych Osobowych — 2025 fining decisions

Looking for a workspace for your DPO work?

DPO Workspace is built by a certified DPO. 30-day free trial.

Start free

Related articles

Enforcement
€16,7Mfor telemarketing and contracts activated without consent

Italian DPA fines Wind Tre €16.7 million: telemarketing despite objections and contracts activated without customers' knowledge

People who had objected kept receiving calls, and some contracts were activated without the person knowing. The Garante fines Wind Tre €16.7 million and restates a principle for every company with an agency network: responsibility is not outsourced along with sales.

Oct 12, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
€350kto controller and processor over outdated systems

Greece: €350,000 for a data breach — both the Ministry and the processor running outdated systems fined, and there was no Article 28 contract

An attack on the systems of the agency running a Ministry's programmes exposed identification, financial and health data of a very large number of people. The Hellenic DPA fines the controller €200,000 and the processor €150,000: notifying well is not enough if the supplier works on outdated systems and the relationship is not governed by a contract.

Oct 08, 2026New 5 min
Enforcement
€4kfor a camera pointed at a home

Italian DPA fines the municipality of Arvier €4,000: a camera filmed a resident's windows and balconies, and the masking came too late

A small municipality in the Aosta Valley uses cameras for traffic, parking, number plates, the environment and civil protection. A resident finds that one covers her home. The Garante imposes a fine and makes a point that applies to every system: masking private areas is designed before the camera is switched on, not after the complaint.

Oct 08, 2026New 5 min