Your cookie preferences

EDPB guidance · Art. 7 GDPR

We use technical cookies essential for the platform to work (login, security, sessions). We would also like to use analytics cookies to understand how to improve it.

You can accept all, reject all, or choose which categories to switch on.Your consent is valid for 6 months and you can withdraw it at any time from the footer.

You will find everything in our privacy notice.

All news
Regulation September 3, 2026 7 min

The European Health Data Space applies in a little over six months, and the two opt-outs it contains are not the same thing

Regulation (EU) 2025/327: application from 26 March 2027, secondary use from 26 March 2029. Article 10 leaves Member States the option of providing an opt-out in primary use; Article 71 gives every person the right to opt out of secondary use, at any time and without giving a reason

In brief

Regulation (EU) 2025/327 on the European Health Data Space has been in force since 26 March 2025 and applies from 26 March 2027. Chapter IV, on secondary use, applies from 26 March 2029. It contains two different opt-out mechanisms: Article 10 is an option left to Member States, Article 71 is a right belonging to the person.

What the Regulation does

The Regulation distinguishes two uses of electronic health data. Primary use is the purpose the data were collected for: care. Secondary use is everything else — research, innovation, official statistics, policy-making, regulatory activities. For the first, the Regulation builds a person's access to their own data and a health professional's access to the data of the patient under treatment, including across borders. For the second, it builds an infrastructure of national bodies that issue data permits.

There are four dates, not one

  • 26 March 2025: entry into force, the twentieth day after publication in the Official Journal of 5 March 2025.
  • 26 March 2027: general application of the Regulation.
  • 26 March 2029: Chapter IV on secondary use applies, and Articles 3 to 15 apply to the priority categories of data listed in Article 14(1), points (a), (b) and (c).
  • 26 March 2031: the same articles apply to the categories listed in points (d), (e) and (f), which include test results and medical imaging.

The two opt-outs

This is where confusion is easiest, because the word is the same and the legal nature is not.

Article 10 concerns primary use and opens by saying that Member States' laws may provide for the right to opt out: it is an option, not an obligation. A Member State that exercises it must ensure the opt-out is reversible and establish the rules and safeguards of the mechanism, including the possibility for a health professional to access the data anyway where processing is necessary to protect the vital interests of the person or of another individual.

Article 71 concerns secondary use and leaves nobody a choice: natural persons have the right to opt out at any time, without giving any reason, from the processing of their personal electronic health data for secondary use. It is not a Member State option, it is a directly conferred right.

The mistake to avoid

The Regulation does not replace the GDPR and does not derogate from it: it sits on top of it. Legal bases, information notices, the record of processing and the impact assessment remain those of Regulation 2016/679. Anyone reading the European Health Data Space as a special regime that absorbs the rest is preparing documentation that will answer the questions of neither instrument.

What to do now, if you advise a healthcare client

  • Know which of the Article 14 priority categories the client actually processes: the application date changes depending on the point.
  • Check whether and how the State where the client operates has exercised the Article 10 option, because the answer is not the same across the Union.
  • Look at the electronic health record systems in use: Chapter III imposes requirements on the systems, not only on those who use them, and the supplier has to be involved now, not in 2027.
  • Do not wait until 2029 for secondary use: those who release data for research are already doing so today, and the incoming rules will also ask about what was built beforehand.
Official source:Regulation (EU) 2025/327 — full text on EUR-Lex

Looking for a workspace for your DPO work?

DPO Workspace is built by a certified DPO. 30-day free trial.

Start free

Related articles

Regulation
nullathe decision on a worker taken by the algorithm alone, from 23 October

A dismissal decided by the algorithm is void: from 23 October in Italy

Published in Official Gazette no. 234 of 8 October 2026 and in force since 23 October, decree no. 179/2026 provides that final decisions on the employment relationship cannot be based solely on automated processing, that the worker may request an understandable explanation, and that decisions taken in breach are void. In parallel, AI systems affecting work organisation enter the risk assessment under Article 28 of decree 81/2008. For a DPO this is the rare case where the consequence is not economic but civil, and it changes how the check is framed.

Oct 08, 2026New 8 min
Regulation
3signals that make notification due

Poland's UODO: not every breach must be notified. Public-register data on one side, PESEL, health and financial data on the other

If an invoicing system leaks only a sole trader's name, business name, tax number and registered address, already public in the business register, risk is normally unlikely. If it also leaks the national ID number, purchase details revealing health, or financial data, notification is due. Either way, the decision goes into the internal register.

Oct 05, 2026New 5 min
Regulation
120days to charge you, not to fine you

The 120 days are not the deadline to fine you: they are the deadline to charge you

Anyone who built an appeal on the authority's delay should re-read the calendar. The Court clarifies three things: the complaint procedure and the sanctioning procedure are autonomous, so overrunning the nine-to-twelve months on the complaint does not extinguish the power to fine; the 120 days are for notifying the charge, not for imposing the fine; and they run from the «definitive finding», which is not the first notice but the moment the authority can assess every element — including the hearing of your side. After the charge, only the five-year limitation period remains.

Sep 20, 2026 7 min